Legal Outsourcing Supervision Plan Builder
Pick the tasks you are handing to remote support staff and get back a written supervision plan: what is delegated, what stays with the lawyer, what your state expects on client consent, and how the work may be billed.
5 sources
ABA and four state positions
In browser
nothing sent or stored
Free
no signup needed
Build your plan
Nothing you type here leaves your browser. There is no signup and no data is stored.
What are you handing over?
Select every task. The ones marked as lawyer decisions are included on purpose. If your current arrangement includes one of them, the plan will say so.
Intake and reception
Conflicts and file opening
Calendaring and deadlines
Records and discovery
Drafting and filing
Client communication
Billing and finance
Your plan
6 delegated tasks- Guidance applied
- ABA model position
- Client consent
- Required where protected information is shared
On client consent
Make appropriate disclosure to the client about the use of lawyers or nonlawyers outside the firm, and obtain client consent if those people will receive information protected by Rule 1.6.
ABA Formal Opinion 08-451 (August 5, 2008)On billing
Where the work is billed as a fee for legal services, the total charge must be reasonable under Rule 1.5(a). Formal Opinion 00-420 permits a surcharge over what the firm pays, provided the total is reasonable. Where the work is billed to the client as a cost or expense instead, and there is no understanding to the contrary, the client may be charged only the cost directly associated with the services.
Where the work happens
Where the work is performed is one of the circumstances Rule 5.3 tells you to weigh, along with the terms of any arrangement protecting client information and the legal and ethical environments of the jurisdictions involved. Florida expects extra precautions on data security, encryption, and destruction for exactly this reason.
What this combination flags
Overhead treatment is the simplest position to defend
If the support cost is absorbed as overhead and never appears on a client bill, the fee questions in every opinion on this page fall away and you are left with the supervision, confidentiality, conflicts, and consent duties. Most small firms using remote support staff land here.
No supervising lawyer named
Rules 5.1 and 5.3 attach to people, not to firms. Name the lawyer responsible for this arrangement. Florida requires multi lawyer firms to record in writing who is responsible for trust account reconciliation, and the same clarity is worth having for every delegated workflow.
Controls for the work you are delegating
Answer the main line and route calls
Script the call opening so the caller is told they are speaking with staff, not with a lawyer, and that no legal advice can be given on the call.
Book consultations on the firm calendar
Publish the qualifying questions and the calendar rules in writing so the answer to who gets a slot never depends on the person taking the call.
Collect intake information on a standard form
Fix the form fields. Anything a caller asks that is not on the form goes to the supervising lawyer rather than being answered.
Open and organize the matter file
Use a fixed folder structure and naming convention so a file opened by someone in another time zone looks identical to one opened in the office.
Request, chase, and index medical or employment records
Track authorizations and expiry dates. Records requests usually involve protected health information, so this is the workflow to secure first.
Send scheduling and logistics updates to clients
Define the boundary in writing: dates, documents needed, appointment confirmations, and receipt acknowledgments. Any question about the case itself is escalated, not answered.
Copy the written plan
SUPERVISION AND DUE DILIGENCE PLAN FOR DELEGATED SUPPORT WORK
Firm: [Firm name]
Responsible lawyer: [Supervising lawyer]
Provider or staff member: [Provider or staff member]
Role: Legal intake specialist
Work performed: Outside the United States
Guidance applied: ABA model position
System access: Only the matters they are assigned
Billing treatment: Not billed to clients at all, treated as firm overhead
Supervision cadence: Daily for the first two weeks, then weekly
1. SCOPE OF DELEGATED WORK
- Answer the main line and route calls.
Control: Script the call opening so the caller is told they are speaking with staff, not with a lawyer, and that no legal advice can be given on the call.
- Book consultations on the firm calendar.
Control: Publish the qualifying questions and the calendar rules in writing so the answer to who gets a slot never depends on the person taking the call.
- Collect intake information on a standard form.
Control: Fix the form fields. Anything a caller asks that is not on the form goes to the supervising lawyer rather than being answered.
- Open and organize the matter file.
Control: Use a fixed folder structure and naming convention so a file opened by someone in another time zone looks identical to one opened in the office.
- Request, chase, and index medical or employment records.
Control: Track authorizations and expiry dates. Records requests usually involve protected health information, so this is the workflow to secure first.
- Send scheduling and logistics updates to clients.
Control: Define the boundary in writing: dates, documents needed, appointment confirmations, and receipt acknowledgments. Any question about the case itself is escalated, not answered.
2. WORK RETAINED BY THE RESPONSIBLE LAWYER
The following are decisions, not tasks. They are not delegated under this plan, and support staff may prepare inputs for them and carry them out once made.
- Decide whether the firm takes the case.
- Tell a caller what their legal options or chances are.
- Quote or negotiate the fee.
- Decide whether a conflict hit blocks the matter.
- Decide which rule controls a deadline.
- Decide what is privileged or what gets withheld.
- Set the demand or approve a settlement figure.
- Sign pleadings or appear on the matter.
- Answer client questions about the case itself.
- Authorize transfers out of the trust account.
3. CONFIDENTIALITY AND ACCESS CONTROLS
Access level: Only the matters they are assigned.
This is the posture Florida describes: access to the information necessary to complete the work on that particular client's matter, and no access to information about the firm's other clients.
Controls in force: a signed confidentiality agreement covering all client information; named individual accounts with no shared logins; multi factor authentication on every system holding client data; access granted per matter where the software supports it; access revoked the same day an assignment or engagement ends; a written rule that client files are not stored on personal devices or personal cloud accounts; and a documented process for returning or destroying client data at the end of the engagement.
4. CLIENT DISCLOSURE AND CONSENT
Position applied: ABA model position.
Make appropriate disclosure to the client about the use of lawyers or nonlawyers outside the firm, and obtain client consent if those people will receive information protected by Rule 1.6.
Implementation: state in the engagement letter that the firm uses support personnel who are not lawyers, describe generally what they do and where they work, confirm that they work under the supervision of the responsible lawyer, and confirm that they are bound by the same confidentiality obligations. Record the client's consent where the applicable guidance calls for it.
5. BILLING TREATMENT
Where the work is billed as a fee for legal services, the total charge must be reasonable under Rule 1.5(a). Formal Opinion 00-420 permits a surcharge over what the firm pays, provided the total is reasonable. Where the work is billed to the client as a cost or expense instead, and there is no understanding to the contrary, the client may be charged only the cost directly associated with the services.
6. SUPERVISION CADENCE AND REVIEW
Cadence: Daily for the first two weeks, then weekly.
[Supervising lawyer] reviews delegated work product before it leaves the firm, confirms every calendar entry within one business day, and is the single escalation point for anything the plan does not cover.
Escalation rule given to the provider in writing: if a client asks a question about the case itself, if a document looks like it starts a deadline, if anything appears to involve an opposing party the firm may also represent, or if the task is not on the list above, stop and escalate rather than proceeding.
Record of supervision: keep dated notes of review sessions, the corrections made, and the work sampled. Supervision that is not recorded is difficult to demonstrate later.
7. SELECTION AND DUE DILIGENCE ON FILE
- Background information about any intermediary that employs the staff member.
- Resume of the individual assigned to this firm.
- Reference checks completed and dated.
- Interview conducted to establish suitability for this specific assignment.
- Work product sample reviewed.
- Confirmation that channels of communication support timely and ongoing supervision.
- Written confidentiality agreement, data security terms, and conflicts undertaking signed.
This list is taken from North Carolina 2007 Formal Ethics Opinion 12, which sets out selection duties in more detail than most sources.
8. CONFLICTS
The firm runs its own conflicts check on every new matter and clears the result through a lawyer. The provider confirms in writing that it will disclose any relationship that could create a conflict, including work performed for other firms or parties in the same matter, and will not work on both sides of a matter the firm is handling.
9. FLAGS RAISED WHEN THIS PLAN WAS GENERATED
[NOTE] Overhead treatment is the simplest position to defend
If the support cost is absorbed as overhead and never appears on a client bill, the fee questions in every opinion on this page fall away and you are left with the supervision, confidentiality, conflicts, and consent duties. Most small firms using remote support staff land here.
[REVIEW] No supervising lawyer named
Rules 5.1 and 5.3 attach to people, not to firms. Name the lawyer responsible for this arrangement. Florida requires multi lawyer firms to record in writing who is responsible for trust account reconciliation, and the same clarity is worth having for every delegated workflow.
Reviewed and approved by: [Supervising lawyer]
Date: ____________________
Source of the guidance summarized above: ABA Formal Opinion 08-451 (August 5, 2008). This plan is a working document generated from published ethics guidance for general information. It is not legal advice, and rules differ by jurisdiction and change over time. Confirm the current text of your own state's rules and opinions before relying on it.This builder summarizes published ethics opinions for general information. It is not legal advice, rules differ by jurisdiction, and opinions are amended. Read your own state’s rule and opinion before you rely on any of it. If you want help staffing the delegated work, DocketHire places trained remote legal support with US law firms under your supervision: book a free consultation.
The question is not whether you may outsource. It was answered in 2008.
Firms still ask whether it is permissible to use remote or offshore support staff, and the ethics authorities settled that a long time ago. ABA Formal Opinion 08-451 concluded in August 2008 that a lawyer may outsource legal or nonlegal support services provided the lawyer remains ultimately responsible for rendering competent legal services to the client. State opinions reached the same place, several of them earlier: New York City Bar in 2006, North Carolina and Florida in 2007, Ohio in 2009.
The live question is a different one. Every one of those opinions attaches conditions, and the conditions are where firms actually get into trouble. Not because anyone intended to cut a corner, but because the arrangement grew informally, the scope was never written down, access was granted at the system level because it was faster, and the engagement letter said nothing. None of that is exotic. It is what happens when a firm hires help and gets busy.
The tool above turns those conditions into a document. Select the tasks you are actually handing over, and it separates the ones a trained nonlawyer can prepare from the ones that are legal judgment, applies your jurisdiction’s position on client consent and billing, and produces a plan a responsible lawyer can review and sign. It takes about three minutes and it is the artifact that makes the arrangement describable.
The five duties that do not move when the work does
Every opinion on this page is an application of the same five model rules. Read them once in this order and the state variations become much easier to follow, because the states differ mainly on two of the five.
Competence, Model Rule 1.1
The outsourcing lawyer stays ultimately responsible for rendering competent legal services to the client. Delegating the task does not delegate the standard. Formal Opinion 08-451 opens with exactly this point and everything after it follows from there.
Supervision, Model Rules 5.1 and 5.3
A lawyer using nonlawyers outside the firm must make reasonable efforts to ensure the services are provided in a manner compatible with the lawyer's own professional obligations. The comment to Rule 5.3 sets out what the extent of that effort depends on: the education, experience and reputation of the nonlawyer, the nature of the services involved, the terms of any arrangements concerning the protection of client information, and the legal and ethical environments of the jurisdictions in which the services will be performed.
Confidentiality, Model Rule 1.6
Client information protected by Rule 1.6 does not lose that protection because it moved to a vendor. Formal Opinion 477R directs a fact based analysis of what security is reasonable, weighing the sensitivity of the information and the extent to which privacy is protected by law or by a confidentiality agreement, and says special precautions may be required when the nature of the information demands a higher degree of security.
Fees, Model Rule 1.5
The total charged to the client must be reasonable. Formal Opinion 00-420 draws the distinction that matters operationally: billed as a fee for legal services, a surcharge over what the firm pays is permitted so long as the total is reasonable; billed as a cost or expense, and absent an understanding to the contrary, the client may be charged only the cost directly associated with the services.
Unauthorized practice, Model Rule 5.5
The lawyer must not assist the unauthorized practice of law. This is the duty the task list in the tool above is built around. Preparation, assembly, indexing, scheduling, and drafting from approved templates are support work. Deciding what the law requires for a specific client is not, and no amount of supervision converts it.
What the opinions say, and where they disagree
These five are summarized from the opinions themselves rather than from secondary commentary. They agree on the shape of the duty and diverge on two points that have operational consequences: whether client consent is a condition or a circumstance-dependent step, and what you are permitted to charge. If you practice in more than one state, those two are the ones to check first.
American Bar Association
Formal Opinion 08-451 (August 5, 2008)The anchor opinion. A lawyer may outsource legal or nonlegal support services provided the lawyer remains ultimately responsible for competent representation under Rule 1.1. In complying with that obligation, the lawyer must comply with Rules 5.1 and 5.3 and should make reasonable efforts to ensure the conduct of the outsourced lawyers or nonlawyers is compatible with the lawyer's own professional obligations. Appropriate disclosures should be made to the client about the use of lawyers or nonlawyers outside the firm, and client consent should be obtained if those people will receive information protected by Rule 1.6. Fees must be reasonable under Rule 1.5, and the lawyer must avoid assisting the unauthorized practice of law under Rule 5.5.
ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Formal Opinion 08-451North Carolina
2007 Formal Ethics Opinion 12The most useful opinion in the set if you are actually setting up an arrangement, because it says what selection means in practice. A lawyer may outsource limited legal support services to a foreign lawyer or nonlawyer provided the lawyer properly selects and supervises them, ensures the preservation of client confidences, avoids conflicts, discloses the outsourcing, and obtains the client's advance informed consent. On selection, the opinion lists obtaining background information about any intermediary employing the assistants, obtaining their resumes, conducting reference checks, interviewing them to determine suitability for the particular assignment, obtaining a work product sample, and confirming that appropriate channels of communication exist so supervision can be provided in a timely and ongoing manner.
North Carolina State Bar, 2007 Formal Ethics Opinion 12Florida
Ethics Opinion 07-2A lawyer is not prohibited from engaging an overseas provider for paralegal assistance as long as the lawyer adequately addresses the obligations relating to assisting the unlicensed practice of law, supervision of nonlawyers, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, and billing. Two specifics stand out. On access, the firm should allow the provider only the information necessary to complete the work for that particular client and should provide no access to information about the firm's other clients. On billing, the firm may charge actual costs unless the service is treated as overhead, and on a contingency fee matter it is improper to bill separately for work that would ordinarily be performed by the attorney, even when outsourced.
The Florida Bar, Ethics Opinion 07-2New York City Bar
Formal Opinion 2006-3A New York lawyer may ethically outsource legal support services overseas to a nonlawyer if the lawyer rigorously supervises the nonlawyer, preserves the client's confidences and secrets, avoids conflicts of interest, bills for the outsourcing appropriately, and, when necessary, obtains advance client consent. The billing position is the strictest of the five: it is inappropriate to include the cost of outsourcing in the legal fee, and absent a specific agreement with the client to the contrary, the lawyer should charge no more than the direct cost of the outsourcing plus a reasonable allocation of overhead expenses directly associated with providing that service.
New York City Bar Association, Formal Opinion 2006-3Ohio
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, Opinion 2009-6 (August 14, 2009)Ohio reached the consent question through Rules 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 read together and concluded that a lawyer must obtain the client's informed consent before outsourcing legal or support services to lawyers or nonlawyers. The opinion addressed the argument that outsourcing is impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6 and rejected it, stating that the contention fails to pass ethical muster. If you operate in more than one state, this is the opinion that shows the consent question is not settled the same way everywhere.
Ohio Bar Liability Insurance Company, hotline discussion of Opinion 2009-6These summaries describe published ethics guidance for general information. They are not legal advice, opinions are amended and withdrawn, and your state may have addressed this differently or not at all. Confirm the current text of the rule and opinion that governs your practice before relying on any of it.
Where these arrangements actually go wrong
None of these are exotic ethical dilemmas. They are ordinary operational gaps, and each one is closed by a short written artifact that takes less time to produce than to explain.
The scope was never written down
The most common failure is not a bad decision, it is the absence of one. Staff were hired to help, the work grew by accretion, and nobody ever wrote a list of what they do. Two years later the answer to what the assistant is permitted to do is whatever they did last week. Rule 5.3 asks for reasonable efforts to ensure the work is compatible with the lawyer's professional obligations, and it is hard to make an effort about a scope nobody has defined.
The escalation rule does not exist
A support worker who does not know when to stop will guess, and the guess will be helpful and wrong. The rule that prevents most of this is one sentence long: if a client asks about the case itself, if a document might start a clock, if a name looks like it could be adverse to another client, or if the task is not on the list, escalate. Give it to them in writing on day one.
Access was granted at the system level because it was easier
Practice management software often makes it simpler to grant access to everything than to configure it per matter. Florida's opinion addresses this directly and says the provider should get the information necessary for that client's matter and no access to information about other clients. If your software supports matter level permissions, the extra fifteen minutes of setup is the whole control.
The engagement letter never mentioned it
Three of the five jurisdictions summarized on this page treat client consent as a condition of the arrangement rather than as something that depends on the circumstances. The engagement letter is where that gets handled, and adding two sentences at the start costs nothing. Retrofitting consent onto a matter that is already underway is a conversation nobody enjoys.
Billing treatment was decided at invoice time
Whether outsourced support is a fee or a cost changes what you are permitted to charge, and the answer differs by state. Deciding it once, in the engagement letter, is a two minute task. Deciding it invoice by invoice produces a billing history that is difficult to explain if it is ever questioned.
Supervision happened but was never recorded
Firms that supervise well often cannot demonstrate it. Keep dated notes of review sessions, what was corrected, and what work was sampled. The record costs a few minutes a week and it is the difference between an arrangement you can describe and one you can evidence.
Where a staffing provider fits, and where it does not
A provider can carry the selection work that North Carolina’s opinion describes: sourcing candidates, verifying experience, checking references, running the interviews, supplying work samples, and replacing someone who is not working out. It can also make the communication channels real, which is the part firms underestimate. Supervision that depends on someone being reachable during your working day is a scheduling problem before it is an ethics problem.
What a provider cannot do is hold the professional obligation. The responsible lawyer still defines the scope, reviews the work, clears the conflicts, decides the disclosure, and signs the plan. Any arrangement described as removing that responsibility is describing something the rules do not permit.
DocketHire places trained remote legal support with US law firms, working in your software and under your supervision, including legal intake specialists, paralegal support, and legal billing assistants. If you are still deciding what the role should cover, the guide to hiring offshore legal staff and the notes on confidentiality and ethics for legal virtual assistants cover the ground before this one. For the supervision mechanics after the hire, see how to train a legal virtual assistant and the remote work security guide.
Questions firms ask
Is it ethical for a law firm to outsource support work to a virtual assistant?
Yes, subject to conditions, and the conditions are the interesting part. ABA Formal Opinion 08-451 concluded in 2008 that a lawyer may outsource legal or nonlegal support services provided the lawyer remains ultimately responsible for rendering competent legal services under Rule 1.1. State opinions reached the same conclusion, including North Carolina 2007 Formal Ethics Opinion 12, Florida Ethics Opinion 07-2, and New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2006-3. What separates a defensible arrangement from a risky one is not whether you outsource but whether you can show the five things every one of those opinions asks about: selection, supervision, confidentiality, conflicts, and appropriate billing, plus client disclosure and consent where the jurisdiction requires it.
Do we have to tell clients that we use offshore or remote support staff?
In several states, yes, and in the rest you should assume something close to it. ABA Formal Opinion 08-451 says appropriate disclosures should be made regarding the use of lawyers or nonlawyers outside the firm, and that client consent should be obtained if they will receive information protected by Rule 1.6. North Carolina requires disclosure and advance informed consent. Ohio Opinion 2009-6 requires informed consent before outsourcing and specifically rejected the argument that outsourcing is impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6. Florida requires client consent before disclosing confidential information to an overseas provider. The practical answer for most firms is to put two sentences in the engagement letter describing that the firm uses supervised support personnel who are not lawyers, and to keep the record of the client's agreement.
What tasks can a nonlawyer assistant not do, no matter how well supervised?
The boundary is not about difficulty, it is about judgment. A nonlawyer cannot decide whether the firm takes a case, quote or negotiate the fee, tell a client or prospect what their legal rights, options, or chances are, decide which rule governs a deadline or how it is computed, clear a conflict, decide what is privileged or what gets produced, set a demand or approve a settlement figure, sign pleadings or appear, or authorize a transfer out of the trust account. Supervision does not convert any of these into support work, because the thing being supervised would be the exercise of legal judgment itself. What a trained assistant absolutely can do is prepare all the inputs for each of those decisions and carry them out once a lawyer has made them, which is most of the labor in every one.
Can we bill clients for outsourced legal support work?
It depends on how you characterize it and where you practice, and the difference is real. ABA Formal Opinion 00-420 holds that when a contract lawyer's services are billed as fees for legal services, a surcharge over cost may be added if the total charge is a reasonable fee under Rule 1.5(a), and that disclosure of the surcharge is not required in that circumstance. When the same services are billed as an expense or cost instead, and absent an understanding to the contrary, the client may be charged only the cost directly associated with the services. New York City Bar Formal Opinion 2006-3 takes a stricter line, saying it is inappropriate to include the cost of outsourcing in the legal fee and that absent a specific agreement the lawyer should charge no more than direct cost plus a reasonable allocation of directly associated overhead. Florida adds that on a contingency matter you cannot separately bill work that would ordinarily be performed by the attorney even when it is outsourced. Many small firms sidestep the whole question by treating support staffing as overhead and never billing it as a line item.
How much supervision is enough?
The rule gives you the factors rather than a number. The comment to Rule 5.3 says the extent of the obligation depends on the education, experience and reputation of the nonlawyer, the nature of the services involved, the terms of any arrangements concerning the protection of client information, and the legal and ethical environments of the jurisdictions in which the services will be performed. Translated into practice: a new assistant doing records retrieval on a matter with no protected health information needs less oversight than an experienced one drafting correspondence on a matter involving minors. Most firms that run this well use daily review for the first two weeks, weekly thereafter, a same day escalation channel, and a written record of what was reviewed. Florida notes that adequate supervision can be more difficult when working with people in a different country and expects extra precautions in that case.
Does using a staffing provider change who is responsible?
No. The responsibility sits with the lawyer regardless of whether the person is an employee, a contractor, or placed through a provider. North Carolina's opinion assumes an intermediary may be involved and responds by asking the lawyer to obtain background information about the intermediary employing the assistants, on top of the resume, references, interview, and work sample for the individual. A provider can do the sourcing, the vetting, the replacement, and the payroll. It cannot hold the professional obligation, and any arrangement presented as removing that obligation should be read closely.
What should be in the confidentiality and data security terms?
At minimum: a signed confidentiality agreement covering all client information and surviving the engagement, named individual accounts with no shared logins, multi factor authentication on every system holding client data, access scoped per matter where the software supports it, same day access revocation when an assignment ends, a prohibition on storing client files on personal devices or personal cloud accounts, and a documented return or destruction process at the end. ABA Formal Opinion 498 on virtual practice covers the general obligations in more detail, including terms of service that protect confidentiality, security updates, strong passwords, antivirus, encryption, secured routers, virtual private networks, and periodic assessment of whether the setup is still adequate. Florida specifically flags data security, encryption, and destruction policies as areas needing extra scrutiny when the work is performed in a foreign jurisdiction with different data protection laws.
Is this tool legal advice?
No. It summarizes published ethics opinions and model rules for general information and assembles them into a working document you can edit. It does not know your state's current rule text, your malpractice carrier's requirements, your practice management software's permission model, or the facts of your matters. Ethics opinions are also amended and withdrawn over time. Read your own jurisdiction's rule and opinion, and if the arrangement is significant, run the plan past your carrier or your ethics counsel before you rely on it.
More tools for law firm operations
Onboarding Plan Generator
A 90 day plan for a new support hire, with supervision checkpoints built in.
Legal Job Description Generator
Turn the delegated scope into a copy-ready job description.
Legal Staff Cost Calculator
The fully loaded cost of an in-house hire, compared to remote support.
Trust Reconciliation Checker
Prove the bank, the trust ledger, and every client ledger agree.
Staff the delegated work with people who already work this way
DocketHire places trained remote legal support with US law firms, working in your software under your supervision. Book a free consultation and we will scope the role to your caseload.